It was great to have the chance to see other people's work today, in Kraak and other venues.
I watched a few of the videos, which I wouldn't normally do, instead being drawn towards sculpture and textile pieces and was most impressed by the Phobia of 13 group's one located downstairs in Incognito - the video was really well put together, with creepy effects and the setting was dressed really well with spider - web -like woolen threads covering the room. I felt uneasy, which was the intended result and it was visually exciting.
I was really disappointed to see that Jacob's video from our group was cut to less than 20 seconds on the loop; it was supposed to be 175 seconds long, to tie in with the anniversary theme, and other groups were given several minutes, some of which were extremely repetitive. It had been made clear to tutors in early tutorials that we would like to use 175 seconds of footage, so it is hard to understand why it was cut so dramatically. The point of exhibiting early on in the course is to give us a chance to prepare work to show and allow others to see it and give feedback. Jacob has not been given this chance.
One unforgettable thing I've learned from this experience is that when arranging an exhibition outside of the University to check in advance what kind of publicity the gallery may or may not use for the exhibit. There was a large sign just inside the door saying 'kraak gallery', but no one had put it out in the street, so mostly the visitors seemed to be other MSA students. Had we realised there would be no easily visible promotion of the gallery or the exhibit, we would have made flyers or signs to get more people to come and see the show. Also it would have been better to have the exhibition on in the evening; most members of the public are busy during the day and with such a short run time an evening showing time could have helped make the exhibition into more of an event.
| Only signage for KRAAK that we could find! |
Something I realised last week was that I should have found the focus of my work sooner; at one point I wanted to churn out papers and origami boxes so I would have 175 of them, and didn't stop to analyse which were working best and which were not. I could have definately saved myself some time and effort if I had kept looking at what I was doing as I did it! I would still like to use my pantone colour boxes and matchsticks in future, even if it is just to photograph them in locations matching their colour, or a place built in the relevant decade.
The personality of the boxes was something that was mentioned in tutorials; I enjoyed trying to find a narrative for them to make one of the origami books, and this could be exploited in future to draw in the viewer and add another level of meaning to my work. It's not something that I've been interested in using before, but I enjoy looking at everyday objects that seem to have their own personality and could easily build a photo collection of these. They could be inspiration for drawings or prints and might inject a new energy into my work.
It is a shame that our group didn't have more active members; for most of our meetings there were 3 of us, (Sue, Safia and myself) and it would have been nice to get a wider variety of perspectives to work with. With more people we could have scaled up our work, found a way to link our pieces or make a single collaborative piece. However I think our individual pieces were successful, the 3 of us worked well in the gallery to install the works and they link together with the 175, play and paper themes. I intend to look at the rest of Jacob's film through Facebook.
I think the film and media students were put under more pressure than the other subjects were, with lots of deadlines occurring during the unit. This meant they could not contribute as much in the beginning. Perhaps if Unit X became an official part of their course, they could give it their undivided attention.
Overall my reaction to Unit X has been mixed. It has confirmed my view that groups can work well together, but only if they are willing to make decisions without people who can't be there, and accept the limits that number impose. I knew Safia and Sue well before working on this project, which made it easier to communicate our ideas equally but it would have been good to have 'fresh meat' to add something different in to the mix. I think the unit overall would have worked better if we had had 2 tutorials a week; that way, most people would come to at least one of them and it would make the level of work expected clearer. It felt like we were given too much time for the amount of work expected. Also, the community feel that we had during the print unit effectively disappeared; I definitely prefer to work with others around. They can give you feedback as you work, and work produced while talking can be more free and spontaneous than pieces produced by yourself with no distractions. In other words, for me I think a little more structure is a good thing. Would I recommend Unit X to a friend? I have to say no in its current form. With a little more structure, better organisation and more input from tutors, a shorter run time and the choice to choose our own venue, that might change to a yes.



.jpg)








